Mar 09 2009
A Review of Windows Movie Maker
Movie Maker is free and comes on most all PCs. I think this is why it gets overlooked. For all it’s drawbacks it still gets the job done for a simple movie. Movie Maker has the basic transitions you’ll need and the ability to extract the audio from a video clip. Also, if your computer has a fire wire port you can capture direct from your camera and then place the finished product back on the Mini-DV tape. This is useful because some film festivals still won’t take a DVD as a submission format, despite it being 2009.
The Good
It’s very simple to use. This is because it lacks bells and whistles and any really sophisticated functions. However for a beginner who just needs to cut their teeth on learning out to cut and dissolve things together in a fashion that isn’t crappy—this’ll do that.
Another good point is that it extracts audio from a video clip within the program. Click on the clip with the audio you want and drag it to the audio/music track and voila, only the audio remains on the storyboard.
Oh, and it’s free.
The Bad
If you are editing AVI, or any other larger file type, and making a movie longer than 5 minutes expect the program to crash a lot. I counteract this by editing together five minute segments, saving them, and then importing them later into one file to send back to the Mini-DV tape or to DVD. However, when doing this, beware. Movie Maker can only save a copy of a movie so many times before some really ugly pixilation occurs. For example, you save copies of those five minute segments, that’s copy 1. Then you import them all together onto the timeline to save as another file, that’s copy 2. Then you import the full version back into movie maker to add some extra effect or audio and save it again, that’s copy 3. Go beyond about 3 copies and you’ll see some parts begin to pixilated. The more copies, the worse it gets. It drives me crazy.
The other major drawback is there’s only one extra audio track. Meaning if you want sound effects and music playing together you’ll need to make a copy with the music added, save it, and then re import it to add the effects. See the above paragraph, for why being forced to make extra copies is bad.
Conclusion
If the end goal for your movie is youtube, Movie Maker is good for that. If you are making something short without a lot of effects, Movie Maker is good for that. For learning to edit and some first time experimenting, Movie Maker is good for this too. About anything else and you’ll want to search for something better. You’ll probably have to bite the bullet and buy something. However this does not mean you have to spend $600 dollars for Final Cut Pro. There are plenty of good alternatives out there for less, in the $50ish range like Sony Vegas. Also search the freeware websites and see what you come up with.
Before I end, a question for all you people out there in the webshere, what’s your favoirte video editing program?
Banner photo by Saine
stock.xchng
